I'm surprised it was this =high=. My real annoyance is that I don't want to be a nerd. Maybe this score happened because of the items I said I owned, which really belong to my husband, but they are here in the house.
I'm 93, which is a Nerd King. I'm blaming this on claiming that COBOL is not a real programming language, which is a pretty nerdy joke. (That and having a chemist father who made me memorize the periodic table.)
I nerd-rate at 64 (low-nerd), but I'll admit that I was going for a higher score. I'm proud of my nerdiness, tho nerdiness seems to equate only to computer and science stuff, not to knowing picky stuff in the social sciences, which >I< think make one just as nerdy. Got the periodic table stuff right [not a surprise to me. tho there are new things in the table now] but not the COBOL question. Why isn't it a programming language, Larry?
I scored low because it was so computer-oriented. It would have been higher if it had been more pop-culture oriented. Hello, I own miniature anime figures, can name every Star Trek crew, and download fan-translated manga off the net, how much nerdier can you get?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 05:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 10:12 am (UTC)I'm surprised it was this =high=. My real annoyance is that I don't want to be a nerd. Maybe this score happened because of the items I said I owned, which really belong to my husband, but they are here in the house.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 03:17 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 05:15 pm (UTC)---L.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-13 05:06 pm (UTC)